You must read Crimes against Logic

Jamie Whyte’s angry and witty rant against the rhetoric, faulty reasoning and misinformation we are subjected to from all sources is fascinating, enlightening and fun. The book is a quick read and will equip you with the tools you need to become a staunch defender of truth.

You can buy it at:
http://www.amazon.com/Crimes-Against-Logic-Jamie-Whyte/dp/0071446435/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5283451-1587818?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1174864371&sr=8-1

Morality in Primates

The New York Times had a very interesting article on morality in primates. As many primates display empathy, understand who has done them favors, display altruistic behavior and take into consideration the greater good of their group when resolving disputes, they are displaying some of the required building blocks for morality.

You can read the entire article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/science/20moral.html?ref=science

Youtube: I told you so :)

In a previous post (http://www.fabricegrinda.com/?p=120), I mentioned that my biggest concern with the Google / Youtube deal was not the valuation, but copyright issues. Now that Viacom has sued Google for $1 billion, those fears seem validated.

That said, traditional media companies probably don’t want to alienate their viewers too much by refusing to embrace the web so chances are that they will settle for a large dollar amount plus a licensing deal.

I wonder how much of the $1.65 billion was put in escrow to be used against copyright claims…

幸福和相信書面文字的危險:)

有趣的是,我們人類是多麼容易上當受騙。 如果我們在紀錄片中讀到或觀看某些內容,我們更有可能相信它。 然後是谷歌的魔力。 如果你在一個主題上寫了足夠多的文章,你就會開始出現在該主題的搜尋結果中——不管你真正知道多少。 很快,有人會把你當作該領域的專家,並要求採訪你。

因此,我驚喜地被誤認為是「國際幸福專家」,並被要求回答幾個問題。 我首先告訴我的面試官,如果她認為我是幸福專家,她會大失所望,但決定一起玩。

我在下面複製我的一些答案,供您閱讀:)

你如何定義幸福?

幸福是一種情緒或情感狀態,其特徵是享受和滿足的感覺。 因此,就像戀愛一樣,你要麼快樂,要麼不快樂,但不一定知道為什麼——你就是。 因此,許多人將幸福定義為他們所做或擁有的事情,就像查理布朗在下面所做的那樣:

幸福
來自《你是個好人》,查理·布朗
(克拉克·格斯納)

幸福就是找到一支鉛筆。
睡在月光下。
報時。
幸福就是學會吹口哨。
系鞋帶
這是第一次。
幸福在打鼓
在你自己的學校樂隊里。
幸福是攜手同行。

幸福是兩種霜淇淋。
知道一個秘密。
爬樹。
幸福是五種不同的蠟筆。
捕捉螢火蟲。
讓他自由。
幸福就是時不時地獨處。
幸福又回家了。

幸福是早晚,
白天和晚上也是如此。
因為幸福是任何人和任何事物
這是你所愛的。

幸福就是有一個妹妹。
分享三明治。
相處融洽。
幸福是一起唱歌
當白晝過去時,
幸福是那些和你一起唱歌的人。

幸福是早晚,
白天和晚上也是如此。
因為幸福是任何人和任何事物
這是你所愛的。

然而,雖然做這些事情會讓查理布朗開心——有時——但它們可能不適合你。

你認為邁向幸福的重要一步是什麼?

儘管我上面說了什麼,但你可以採取明確的深思熟慮的步驟來獲得快樂。

具體說來:

  1. 不要把幸福等同於金錢。
  2. 不要通勤。
  3. 定期鍛煉。
  4. 有很多性生活。
  5. 投入時間和精力建立親密關係。
  6. 停下來反思,沉思生活中的美好事物(換句話說,要心存感激)。
  7. 尋找能發揮你技能的工作,尋找享受你的工作。
  8. 給你的身體提供它需要的睡眠。
  9. 不要為了幸福而追求幸福,享受當下。
  10. 掌控你的生活,為自己設定可實現的目標(換句話說,有目標)。
  11. 有樂觀的態度和人生觀。

你可能會爭辯說,像「感恩」這樣的事情並不容易做到,但即使是像每天在筆記本上寫下今天發生在你身上的三件好事這樣人為的事情,也被證明非常有效!

你相信一個人有可能在大多數時候真正滿足嗎?

絕對! 許多人通常只是因為快樂——基於他們的教養和基因的結合。 然而,即使默認情況下你只是平均幸福,你也可以採取上面提到的11個深思熟慮的步驟來讓你更快樂。

非 sequiturish 結論:學術期刊文章平均有 7 人閱讀,包括作者的媽媽。 也許真正的專家應該寫博客:)

The Science of Happiness

I recently came across an interesting article on the science of happiness in Harvard Magazine recounting the emergence of “positive psychology” as a field of study, its findings and the emergence of new research areas such as the study of joy instead of happiness.

Many of the findings will be familiar to the readers of my previous posts on happiness. However, a few of the research results were surprising such as the fact that having kids tends to slightly decrease happiness.

Here are two interesting paragraphs:

“Nobel Prize-winning psychologist and behavioral economist Daniel Kahneman of Princeton (see “The Marketplace of Perceptions,” March-April 2006, page 50) asked thousands of subjects to keep diaries of episodes during a day—including feelings, activities, companions, and places—and then identified some correlates of happiness. “Commuting to work was way down there—people are in a terrible mood when they commute,” Etcoff says. “Sleep has an enormous effect. If you don’t sleep well, you feel bad. TV watching is just OK, and time spent with the kids is actually low on the mood chart.” Having intimate relations topped the list of positives, followed by socializing—testimony to how important the “need to belong” is to human satisfaction.”

“Gilbert reconsiders his grandmother’s advice on how to live happily ever after: “Find a nice girl, have children, settle down.” Research shows, he says, that the first idea works: married people are happier, healthier, live longer, are richer per capita, and have more sex than single people. But having children “has only a small effect on happiness, and it is a negative one,” he explains. “People report being least happy when their children are toddlers and adolescents, the ages when kids require the most from the parents.” As far as settling down to make a living—well, if money moves you into the middle class, buying food, warmth, and dental treatment—yes, it makes you happier. “The difference between an annual income of $5,000 and one of $50,000 is dramatic,” Gilbert says. “But going from $50,000 to $50 million will not dramatically affect happiness. It’s like eating pancakes: the first one is delicious, the second one is good, the third OK. By the fifth pancake, you’re at a point where an infinite number more pancakes will not satisfy you to any greater degree. But no one stops earning money or striving for more money after they reach $50,000.”

Inside Facebook is a fun, quick read that allows you to experience the startup spirit!

Reading the book, I felt like I was reading about the first two years of almost every startup I have been involved with. The names of the people and product were different, but the ethos and spirit was truly there. I suppose it’s partly that spirit that keeps me going back and starting from scratch over and over again!

The book’s self-help parts are annoying and the story would have been stronger if it focused only on Facebook, but that aside Inside Facebook, with its compelling characters and a story line on the way to fairy tale ending, is extremely fun and energizing!

Why people believe in God

The NY Times just published a great article called “Darwin’s God” discussing why people believe in God. It’s a great complement to reading the enlightening and entertaining “The God Delusion.”

While there are some scientific debates, especially on the evolutionary components of religion, it seems that our three fundament mental frameworks and cognitive tools – agent detection, causal reasoning and theory of mind – predispose us to belief.

Read the full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/04/magazine/04evolution.t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&pagewanted=all

Warren Buffet’s 2006 Letter to his Shareholders

I have been a fan of Warren Buffet’s letter to his shareholders for many years. It is clear, concise, honest, often funny, and provides insight into many matters outside of Berkshire Hathaway. The 2006 version is no exception to the rule.

You should also check out the full Berkshire Hathaway annual report at: www.berkshirehathaway.com

>
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.