Fabrice Grinda

  • Playing with
    Unicorns
  • Featured
  • Categories
  • Portfolio
  • About Me
  • Newsletter
  • AI
    • Pitch me your startup!
    • Fabrice AI
  • PL
    • EN
    • FR
    • AR
    • BN
    • DA
    • DE
    • ES
    • FA
    • HI
    • ID
    • IT
    • JA
    • KO
    • NL
    • PT-BR
    • PT-PT
    • RO
    • RU
    • TH
    • UK
    • UR
    • VI
    • ZH-HANS
    • ZH-HANT
× Image Description

Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Menu

  • PL
    • EN
    • FR
    • AR
    • BN
    • DA
    • DE
    • ES
    • FA
    • HI
    • ID
    • IT
    • JA
    • KO
    • NL
    • PT-BR
    • PT-PT
    • RO
    • RU
    • TH
    • UK
    • UR
    • VI
    • ZH-HANS
    • ZH-HANT
  • Home
  • Playing with Unicorns
  • Featured
  • Categories
  • Portfolio
  • About Me
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Przejdź do treści
Fabrice Grinda

Internet entrepreneurs and investors

× Image Description

Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Fabrice Grinda

Internet entrepreneurs and investors

Miesiąc: październik 2013

Why we play Moneyball rather than Powerball

Why we play Moneyball rather than Powerball

I was reading The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande which shows the efficacy of checklists in complex situations. It resonated with me, because Jose & I use a checklist as part of our angel investing strategy. The checklist does not lead to an invest / don’t invest answer, but it helps us make sure we cover all the bases and keeps us grounded. It’s especially useful when we encounter very eloquent founders or products we love, which tempt us to be less disciplined.

I alluded to the checklist in my last angel investing blog post, And then there were a 100…, but here it is more explicitly:

  • Is the product live?
  • Are the unit economics attractive?
  • Do we like the market?
  • Do we like the team?
  • Do we like the deal terms?

The thinking behind the heuristics

You might argue that as early stage seed investors we should be willing to invest in pre-product companies. However, it’s so inexpensive and easy to launch a site these days, that if someone can’t get the site out of the door with $50-100k of love money, it speaks negatively of their ability to execute leanly and convince others to join them. It also makes us question their ability to raise money if they can’t even get love money from fools, friends and family.

With regards to unit economics, we don’t expect the business to be large and successful. They would not need angel money otherwise. $10k / month in revenues are enough. We don’t expect the business to cover its fixed costs, but we want to make sure the business is profitable on a unit economic level. We typically invest in a company if the net contribution margin per customer over a 12 month period is 2x greater than the customer acquisition cost. We also want to see that the customer acquisition channel can scale. For instance we want to see that there is enough volume in the keywords the company buys such that it can increase its marketing budget from $1k / month to $30k / month without needing to increase the CPCs.

There are counter examples of massive businesses that did not have business models or unit economics for a long time and figured it out later when they got to scale. Google, Facebook and Twitter notably come to mind, but it’s a much riskier approach.

Note that our requirement of unit economics does not mean we expect to see financial projections from startups. When a plan meets reality, reality wins every time! Startup financial projections are not worth the paper they are written on. However, if founders know how much money they are making per customer and know how much each customer costs them, they should have a good sense of where they can be in 12 months with a $500k – $1 million seed investment.

Attractive unit economics are not enough. It’s possible that the business has attractive economics in a small market and is more suited to being a lifestyle business than a venture funded business. We use our 9 business selection criteria to evaluate the market.

What makes for a great team varies based on the category. As we focus on consumer facing businesses we come across many super smart product driven founders – which we love. It’s also not enough. In consumer facing businesses, it’s essential to have a viable customer acquisition strategy. Of late, we have been disappointed by the lack of business savvy of otherwise super smart, product centric founders. This is especially true of Y Combinator founders, who also have a tendency to be very arrogant. This is unbecoming given how early all their businesses are. In startups so much of the success comes from rapid iteration, entrepreneurs need to be accept that they don’t typically have the definite answer and that they will figure it out through execution.

With regards to terms, we are price sensitive. 99% of startups sell for less than $30 million, many for less than $10 million. Entrepreneurs think that raising money at a high valuation or with a high cap is a badge of honor, but raising money at a high valuation prices you out of exits and makes it harder to raise follow-on capital. There is so much frothiness in the seed market today that it’s not uncommon to see startups raising on convertible notes with $5-10 million caps. Given the Series A crunch and the difficulty of raising follow-on money, we are seeing startups with $5 million in revenues raising at $5-10 million pre. As a result if we deem the seed valuation too high, we just wait for the Series A.

We also expect all the terms to be fair, not just the cap on the note. For instance if the company sells before the note converts we expect to get the greater of whatever our equity stake would had been if the note converted or a multiple on our investment, not just our money back. After all we are equity investors, not debt investors. We use notes only because they are cheaper and easier to setup.

Why this approach works for us

I would actually not be using this strategy if I was running a $200 million venture fund based in Silicon Valley. As Peter Thiel points out in his venture class, venture returns follow a power law distribution (read Blake Masters Class 7 notes for more details). A VC portfolio makes money if the best company ends up being worth more than the whole fund. In this type of environment it makes sense to come up with convictions about companies that can be bring 10x returns and not worry too much about what the entry valuation is or whether they already have unit economics. Such a fund does not need to worry about minimizing losses from bad investments, it’s all about finding THE investment that will make the fund.

As I previously mentioned, with our heuristics we would not have invested in Facebook, Pinterest or Twitter. But it’s also important to note we did not have the opportunity to seed invest in them either. There are plenty of great companies coming out of New York, London, and around the world, but if you look at the Internet companies that created most of the value ($10+ billion exits), they are highly concentrated in Silicon Valley. I choose to live in New York for a combination of personal and professional reasons and Jose lives in London. As a result we don’t see the best Valley deals. If we wanted to be professional angels or venture capitalists, we would move to the Valley. We don’t intend to do that and thus leave the best companies to Y Combinator, Ron Conway, Jeff Clavier, Mike Maples, Founders Fund, Sequoia and the like.

Given we don’t expect to be able to invest in the next Facebook, Google or Linkedin, we came up with an approach that makes it probable for us to get 3-5x returns on most deals while minimizing our downside. That’s why of the 30 exits I had in my angel portfolio (which don’t include the companies I created or incubated), I made money on 17 and lost money on 13 – a 57% success rate. I made money on many of the exits that were below $10 million and even several below $5 million. I also managed to recoup part of my investment on most of the 13 companies that I lost money on. Overall for these 30 companies, I invested around $2 million and recouped around $10 million with a 62% IRR.

That’s not to say we don’t have stellar performers in our portfolio – I made 31x on one of my investments, but even that standout performance only accounted for 15% of my overall returns. Admittedly our approach is suited for the limited amount of capital we deploy and would not work if we had to invest significantly more capital. However, as we don’t want to be professional investors, it serves our purposes. It allows us to support many entrepreneurs, while keeping our fingers on the pulse of the market.

For many entrepreneurs, especially first time entrepreneurs, our approach works as it increases the probability that they make money on an exit. On top of that we don’t join boards or have reporting requirements. We decide rapidly whether to invest or not and give direct and honest feedback. We also bring expertise on how to maximize unit economics: long tail dynamic bidding on keywords, purchase funnel optimizations, liquidity building strategies in two-sided marketplaces, etc.

It’s probably worth pointing out that the heuristics and strategy are not set in stone. We adapt to changing market circumstances. I will publish a post in early 2014 detailing how we modified our strategy in 2013 because of the dual impact of seed stage frothiness and the Series A crunch. However, even when we change the approach we keep using a checklist to add rigor our thinking. This might reflect my Cartesian way of looking at the world or assuage the need of my inner economist / management consultant for frameworks and models, but it seems to work.

Autor FabriceData publikacji 15 października, 201316 października, 2023Kategorie Przedsiębiorczość17 komentarzy do Why we play Moneyball rather than Powerball

Search

Recent Posts

  • Sens życia
  • Aktualizacja FJ Labs Q2 2025
  • Rozmowa z Aurenem Hoffmanem na temat świata DaaS: zdywersyfikowane portfele, sprzedaż wtórna i przyjęcia obiadowe
  • Odcinek 50: Trendy na rynku venture
  • Dekodowanie przyszłości: AI, rynek venture i rynki zbytu

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • lipiec 2025
    • czerwiec 2025
    • maj 2025
    • kwiecień 2025
    • marzec 2025
    • luty 2025
    • styczeń 2025
    • grudzień 2024
    • listopad 2024
    • październik 2024
    • wrzesień 2024
    • sierpień 2024
    • lipiec 2024
    • czerwiec 2024
    • maj 2024
    • kwiecień 2024
    • marzec 2024
    • luty 2024
    • styczeń 2024
    • grudzień 2023
    • listopad 2023
    • październik 2023
    • wrzesień 2023
    • sierpień 2023
    • czerwiec 2023
    • maj 2023
    • kwiecień 2023
    • marzec 2023
    • luty 2023
    • styczeń 2023
    • grudzień 2022
    • listopad 2022
    • październik 2022
    • wrzesień 2022
    • sierpień 2022
    • czerwiec 2022
    • maj 2022
    • kwiecień 2022
    • marzec 2022
    • luty 2022
    • styczeń 2022
    • listopad 2021
    • październik 2021
    • wrzesień 2021
    • sierpień 2021
    • lipiec 2021
    • czerwiec 2021
    • kwiecień 2021
    • marzec 2021
    • luty 2021
    • styczeń 2021
    • grudzień 2020
    • listopad 2020
    • październik 2020
    • wrzesień 2020
    • sierpień 2020
    • lipiec 2020
    • czerwiec 2020
    • maj 2020
    • kwiecień 2020
    • marzec 2020
    • luty 2020
    • styczeń 2020
    • listopad 2019
    • październik 2019
    • wrzesień 2019
    • sierpień 2019
    • lipiec 2019
    • czerwiec 2019
    • kwiecień 2019
    • marzec 2019
    • luty 2019
    • styczeń 2019
    • grudzień 2018
    • listopad 2018
    • październik 2018
    • sierpień 2018
    • czerwiec 2018
    • maj 2018
    • marzec 2018
    • luty 2018
    • styczeń 2018
    • grudzień 2017
    • listopad 2017
    • październik 2017
    • wrzesień 2017
    • sierpień 2017
    • lipiec 2017
    • czerwiec 2017
    • maj 2017
    • kwiecień 2017
    • marzec 2017
    • luty 2017
    • styczeń 2017
    • grudzień 2016
    • listopad 2016
    • październik 2016
    • wrzesień 2016
    • sierpień 2016
    • lipiec 2016
    • czerwiec 2016
    • maj 2016
    • kwiecień 2016
    • marzec 2016
    • luty 2016
    • styczeń 2016
    • grudzień 2015
    • listopad 2015
    • wrzesień 2015
    • sierpień 2015
    • lipiec 2015
    • czerwiec 2015
    • maj 2015
    • kwiecień 2015
    • marzec 2015
    • luty 2015
    • styczeń 2015
    • grudzień 2014
    • listopad 2014
    • październik 2014
    • wrzesień 2014
    • sierpień 2014
    • lipiec 2014
    • czerwiec 2014
    • maj 2014
    • kwiecień 2014
    • luty 2014
    • styczeń 2014
    • grudzień 2013
    • listopad 2013
    • październik 2013
    • wrzesień 2013
    • sierpień 2013
    • lipiec 2013
    • czerwiec 2013
    • maj 2013
    • kwiecień 2013
    • marzec 2013
    • luty 2013
    • styczeń 2013
    • grudzień 2012
    • listopad 2012
    • październik 2012
    • wrzesień 2012
    • sierpień 2012
    • lipiec 2012
    • czerwiec 2012
    • maj 2012
    • kwiecień 2012
    • marzec 2012
    • luty 2012
    • styczeń 2012
    • grudzień 2011
    • listopad 2011
    • październik 2011
    • wrzesień 2011
    • sierpień 2011
    • lipiec 2011
    • czerwiec 2011
    • maj 2011
    • kwiecień 2011
    • marzec 2011
    • luty 2011
    • styczeń 2011
    • grudzień 2010
    • listopad 2010
    • październik 2010
    • wrzesień 2010
    • sierpień 2010
    • lipiec 2010
    • czerwiec 2010
    • maj 2010
    • kwiecień 2010
    • marzec 2010
    • luty 2010
    • styczeń 2010
    • grudzień 2009
    • listopad 2009
    • październik 2009
    • wrzesień 2009
    • sierpień 2009
    • lipiec 2009
    • czerwiec 2009
    • maj 2009
    • kwiecień 2009
    • marzec 2009
    • luty 2009
    • styczeń 2009
    • grudzień 2008
    • listopad 2008
    • październik 2008
    • wrzesień 2008
    • sierpień 2008
    • lipiec 2008
    • czerwiec 2008
    • maj 2008
    • kwiecień 2008
    • marzec 2008
    • luty 2008
    • styczeń 2008
    • grudzień 2007
    • listopad 2007
    • październik 2007
    • wrzesień 2007
    • sierpień 2007
    • lipiec 2007
    • czerwiec 2007
    • maj 2007
    • kwiecień 2007
    • marzec 2007
    • luty 2007
    • styczeń 2007
    • grudzień 2006
    • listopad 2006
    • październik 2006
    • wrzesień 2006
    • sierpień 2006
    • lipiec 2006
    • czerwiec 2006
    • maj 2006
    • kwiecień 2006
    • marzec 2006
    • luty 2006
    • styczeń 2006
    • grudzień 2005
    • listopad 2005

    Categories

    • Crypto/Web3
    • Gospodarka
    • Rynki zbytu
    • Gadżety techniczne
    • Podróże
    • Polecane posty
    • Nowy Jork
    • Przegląd roku
    • Zabawy
    • Przedsiębiorczość
    • Szczęście
    • Przemówienia
    • OLX
    • Zabawa z jednorożcami
    • FJ Labs
    • Filmy i programy telewizyjne
    • Wywiady i rozmowy przy kominku
    • Osobiste przemyślenia
    • Książki
    • Przemyślenia biznesowe
    • Gry wideo
    • Przegląd roku
    • Optymalizacja życia
    • FJ Labs
    • Podejmowanie decyzji
    • Gospodarka
    • Asset Light Living
    • Przemyślenia
    • Optymizm i szczęście
    • Psy

    Meta

    • Zaloguj się
    • Kanał wpisów
    • Kanał komentarzy
    • WordPress.org
    Pitch me your startup!
    • Home
    • Playing with Unicorns
    • Featured
    • Categories
    • Portfolio
    • About Me
    • Newsletter
    • Privacy Policy
    × Image Description

    Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

    Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    >
    This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.