Fabrice Grinda

  • Playing with
    Unicorns
  • Featured
  • Categories
  • Portfolio
  • About Me
  • Newsletter
  • AI
  • FR
    • EN
    • AR
    • BN
    • DA
    • DE
    • ES
    • FA
    • HI
    • ID
    • IT
    • JA
    • KO
    • NL
    • PL
    • PT-BR
    • PT-PT
    • RO
    • RU
    • TH
    • UK
    • UR
    • VI
    • ZH-HANS
    • ZH-HANT
× Image Description

Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Menu

  • FR
    • EN
    • AR
    • BN
    • DA
    • DE
    • ES
    • FA
    • HI
    • ID
    • IT
    • JA
    • KO
    • NL
    • PL
    • PT-BR
    • PT-PT
    • RO
    • RU
    • TH
    • UK
    • UR
    • VI
    • ZH-HANS
    • ZH-HANT
  • Home
  • Playing with Unicorns
  • Featured
  • Categories
  • Portfolio
  • About Me
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
Aller au contenu
Fabrice Grinda

Internet entrepreneurs and investors

× Image Description

Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Fabrice Grinda

Internet entrepreneurs and investors

Mois : juillet 2016

Technology and the Future of Work

Technology and the Future of Work

Technological progress continues unabated. The astonishing rate of growth has fueled heated debates about implications on the future of labor and the nature of work. A decade ago, few would have predicted that job categories like iOS development, product management, and search engine marketing would exist today. A world of 3D printed food, virtually free electricity, and unlimited computing power is on the horizon.

But what is the cost of technological revolution? Will it remove humans from the equation? What impact will it toll on incomes, quality of life, and the education of our children? Many worry that the current innovations in automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence forebode economic upheavals of cataclysmic proportions, and that unemployment and starvation will abound.

There is nothing to worry about. Economies adapt. Current jobs will be destroyed, but many more and better jobs will be created. The world will be all the better for it. To give an example from the past, let’s take a step back to 1800. At that time, the vast majority of the population was farming, working 100-hour weeks, seven days a week, just to make ends meet. When the Industrial Revolution came, people feared that the new technology would cause massive unemployment. The Luddites started breaking automated looms, which they thought were taking away their jobs. The irony is that the number of weavers actually quadrupled between 1830 and 1900. The amount of labor required per yard of cloth fell by 98%. This made cloth cheaper and increased demand for it, which in turn created more jobs for weavers. Technology gradually changed the nature of the weaver’s job, and the skills required to do it, rather than replacing it altogether. In general, technology is massively deflationary, leads to radically lower prices, significantly increased demand and new jobs to fill that demand.

At the same time, as jobs get destroyed, new unexpected job categories appear. Whereas 200 years ago there was only one job, farmer, a century later there arose a second, factory worker. As more factory workers entered the labor force, factory jobs became fragmented, creating many more specialty jobs and ultimately advancing the economy. Later as factory jobs moved offshore, or were automated, we got new service jobs. This trend will continue with new job categories being created. Think about the jobs people do today. Many are repetitive, rote and fundamentally uninteresting. Many others are paper-pushing, or rubber-stamping rather than value producing. It’s fantastic for these jobs to be automated freeing up human capital for more interesting and productive work!

Many people look at the number of employees and technology companies and are worried that they are creating many fewer jobs that they destroy. Despite having hundreds of millions of users, Instagram and Whatsapp famously only had respectively 13 and 55 employees when they were acquired by Facebook for $1 billion and $19 billion. While the primary impact of technology has certainly destroyed some jobs, the second-order impact has created new ones on a much greater magnitude. For instance, do online retail platforms like eBay, Amazon Marketplace, and Alibaba have fewer employees than the stores they replaced? Absolutely. But how many people make a living on these platforms? Millions are actually fully employed on them! The way you measure a company’s employment is not just to count its direct employees, but to consider all the services and products that were necessary for it to exist, as well as all the businesses it created.

Those companies are just the tip of the iceberg. Platforms like Upwork have also created millions of jobs. Another case in point is the market opened up by Airbnb. Vacation rentals and apartment sublet have become multi-billion-dollar industries in their own right. The entire subletting market in the US was estimated at $1 billion a decade ago. This year Airbnb alone will do more than $10 billion in bookings! Many people now make a living or supplement their income renting apartments or their room on Airbnb. Despite the company’s success, the hotel industry continues to thrive.

It’s also worth pointing out that transitions are slower than many suspect. It takes a while for regulations and cultural norms to change and adopt the technology. It also takes a while for the technology to reach a price point where it can replace humans in 100% of cases. With self-driving cars for instance, the jobs now held by the 3.6 million drivers in the US will not disappear overnight. Many humans are not yet comfortable giving up driving. It’s still unclear who is liable in the case of an accident by a self-driving car. Most importantly, they are still cost-prohibitive. Once the technology is fully ready, it will first replace humans in cases where it makes the most economic sense, long distance trucking perhaps. It will only seep into the mass market as prices decline and it becomes more culturally and socially accepted.

In spite of all of the evidence, many people cannot wrap their heads around how the destruction of jobs can actually lead to new jobs. They have fallen victim to what economists term the “Lump of Labor Fallacy,” which is the contention that the amount of work available to laborers is fixed. These people conclude that they will become unemployed if their jobs are destroyed or if other people agree to take those jobs at lower wages. But demand for labor is actually not fixed.

When the 35-hour workweek was adopted in France, the French reasoned that, if people now worked 40 hours weekly, and this was reduced to 35 hours, employment would increase. This was totally wrong, and the only result was that demand for labor decreased.

To take an example from immigration, in 1980, Fidel Castro emptied Cuba’s jails and sent all the convicts to Miami, Florida. Between April and October of that year, during the Mariel boatlift around 125,000 Cubans relocated. Miami had a population of 800,000 at that time. Due to the massive increase in Miami’s population, the locals feared that Cuban immigrants would take all of their jobs. In reality, the unemployment rate of Miami actually declined. The Cubans were able to find jobs, many of which never existed before. The increased population created a demand for more housing, grocery stores, hair salons, barbershops, and retail outlets. As the population increased, the demand for new business increased as well.

Idle labor finds a use, whether its cause originates from artificial intelligence, robots or immigration. I cannot tell you what that use will be, the same way that 100 years ago people had no idea that the jobs of the future would include airplane pilot or web developer.

In general, technology leads to the more efficient allocation of labor. If technology replaces people, they suddenly become free and start doing new more productive work. Even if these people do not find a more productive channel for their labor, the benefit to society of their replacement is greater than the cost. Similarly, when US steel industry was being destroyed, the government imposed a high tariff on imported steel. It increased the cost of goods that use steel (such as cars) for everyone else. Estimates suggest that each job saved cost $550,000 annually! It would have been better to just give these people $50,000 and retrain them, and not impose the tariffs at all.

As technology makes things dramatically cheaper, it makes us dramatically wealthier as we can buy much more with the same level of income. As a result, many people will choose to work less, because they will need less in order to live. Technology already allows us to work much less now than our ancestors did in the past. 100 years ago most people took no vacation. They worked seven-day work weeks until the advent of weekends, which first emerged as one-day breaks, before evolving into the two-day weekend we know today. As people became richer, they have increasingly chosen to work less. We no longer work 100 hours/week. In the US, people now work on average 39 hours per week. We have decided to take more vacation time, work less, and our quality of life has dramatically improved. That trend will continue as technology continues to decrease our cost of living across the board.

So ask yourself again. As society continues to advance technologically, is the world at risk of massive unemployment and dire poverty? Absolutely not. Quite the contrary, we are on the eve of an extraordinary revolution where we will all know abundance and where starvation and extreme poverty will be a thing of the past. This future can’t get here quickly enough!

featured

Auteur FabricePublié le juillet 11, 2016août 29, 2023Catégories Réflexions personnelles, L'économieLaisser un commentaire sur Technology and the Future of Work

Search

Recent Posts

  • Le Sens de la Vie
  • Mise à jour du T2 2025 de FJ Labs
  • Conversation avec Auren Hoffman sur le monde du DaaS : portefeuilles diversifiés, ventes secondaires et dîners en tête-à-tête
  • Épisode 50 : Tendances du marché du capital-risque
  • Décoder l’avenir : L’IA, le marché du risque et les places de marché

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • juillet 2025
    • juin 2025
    • mai 2025
    • avril 2025
    • mars 2025
    • février 2025
    • janvier 2025
    • décembre 2024
    • novembre 2024
    • octobre 2024
    • septembre 2024
    • août 2024
    • juillet 2024
    • juin 2024
    • mai 2024
    • avril 2024
    • mars 2024
    • février 2024
    • janvier 2024
    • décembre 2023
    • novembre 2023
    • octobre 2023
    • septembre 2023
    • août 2023
    • juin 2023
    • mai 2023
    • avril 2023
    • mars 2023
    • février 2023
    • janvier 2023
    • décembre 2022
    • novembre 2022
    • octobre 2022
    • septembre 2022
    • août 2022
    • juin 2022
    • mai 2022
    • avril 2022
    • mars 2022
    • février 2022
    • janvier 2022
    • novembre 2021
    • octobre 2021
    • septembre 2021
    • août 2021
    • juillet 2021
    • juin 2021
    • avril 2021
    • mars 2021
    • février 2021
    • janvier 2021
    • décembre 2020
    • novembre 2020
    • octobre 2020
    • septembre 2020
    • août 2020
    • juillet 2020
    • juin 2020
    • mai 2020
    • avril 2020
    • mars 2020
    • février 2020
    • janvier 2020
    • novembre 2019
    • octobre 2019
    • septembre 2019
    • août 2019
    • juillet 2019
    • juin 2019
    • avril 2019
    • mars 2019
    • février 2019
    • janvier 2019
    • décembre 2018
    • novembre 2018
    • octobre 2018
    • août 2018
    • juin 2018
    • mai 2018
    • mars 2018
    • février 2018
    • janvier 2018
    • décembre 2017
    • novembre 2017
    • octobre 2017
    • septembre 2017
    • août 2017
    • juillet 2017
    • juin 2017
    • mai 2017
    • avril 2017
    • mars 2017
    • février 2017
    • janvier 2017
    • décembre 2016
    • novembre 2016
    • octobre 2016
    • septembre 2016
    • août 2016
    • juillet 2016
    • juin 2016
    • mai 2016
    • avril 2016
    • mars 2016
    • février 2016
    • janvier 2016
    • décembre 2015
    • novembre 2015
    • septembre 2015
    • août 2015
    • juillet 2015
    • juin 2015
    • mai 2015
    • avril 2015
    • mars 2015
    • février 2015
    • janvier 2015
    • décembre 2014
    • novembre 2014
    • octobre 2014
    • septembre 2014
    • août 2014
    • juillet 2014
    • juin 2014
    • mai 2014
    • avril 2014
    • février 2014
    • janvier 2014
    • décembre 2013
    • novembre 2013
    • octobre 2013
    • septembre 2013
    • août 2013
    • juillet 2013
    • juin 2013
    • mai 2013
    • avril 2013
    • mars 2013
    • février 2013
    • janvier 2013
    • décembre 2012
    • novembre 2012
    • octobre 2012
    • septembre 2012
    • août 2012
    • juillet 2012
    • juin 2012
    • mai 2012
    • avril 2012
    • mars 2012
    • février 2012
    • janvier 2012
    • décembre 2011
    • novembre 2011
    • octobre 2011
    • septembre 2011
    • août 2011
    • juillet 2011
    • juin 2011
    • mai 2011
    • avril 2011
    • mars 2011
    • février 2011
    • janvier 2011
    • décembre 2010
    • novembre 2010
    • octobre 2010
    • septembre 2010
    • août 2010
    • juillet 2010
    • juin 2010
    • mai 2010
    • avril 2010
    • mars 2010
    • février 2010
    • janvier 2010
    • décembre 2009
    • novembre 2009
    • octobre 2009
    • septembre 2009
    • août 2009
    • juillet 2009
    • juin 2009
    • mai 2009
    • avril 2009
    • mars 2009
    • février 2009
    • janvier 2009
    • décembre 2008
    • novembre 2008
    • octobre 2008
    • septembre 2008
    • août 2008
    • juillet 2008
    • juin 2008
    • mai 2008
    • avril 2008
    • mars 2008
    • février 2008
    • janvier 2008
    • décembre 2007
    • novembre 2007
    • octobre 2007
    • septembre 2007
    • août 2007
    • juillet 2007
    • juin 2007
    • mai 2007
    • avril 2007
    • mars 2007
    • février 2007
    • janvier 2007
    • décembre 2006
    • novembre 2006
    • octobre 2006
    • septembre 2006
    • août 2006
    • juillet 2006
    • juin 2006
    • mai 2006
    • avril 2006
    • mars 2006
    • février 2006
    • janvier 2006
    • décembre 2005
    • novembre 2005

    Categories

    • Crypto/Web3
    • Livres
    • Réflexions sur les affaires
    • Manifestations de créativité
    • L'esprit d'entreprise
    • Articles en vedette
    • Bilan de l'année
    • Optimisation de la vie
    • FJ Labs
    • Prise de décision
    • L'économie
    • Asset Light Living
    • Réflexions
    • Optimisme et bonheur
    • Chiens
    • FJ Labs
    • Le bonheur
    • Interviews et conversations informelles
    • Places de marché
    • Films et séries télévisées
    • New York (en anglais)
    • OLX
    • Panels et tables rondes
    • Réflexions personnelles
    • Jouer avec les licornes
    • Jeux
    • L'économie
    • Citations et poèmes
    • Discours
    • Gadgets technologiques
    • Voyages
    • Jeux vidéo
    • Bilan de l'année

    Meta

    • Connexion
    • Flux des publications
    • Flux des commentaires
    • Site de WordPress-FR
    • Home
    • Playing with Unicorns
    • Featured
    • Categories
    • Portfolio
    • About Me
    • Newsletter
    • Privacy Policy
    × Image Description

    Subscribe to Fabrice's Newsletter

    Tech Entrepreneurship, Economics, Life Philosophy and much more!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    >
    This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.